Once
again the debate is raging in Taiwan on weather or not to finish and then
perhaps one day begin operating the Gongliao number 4 nuclear power
plant.
The
two main questions currently being debated appear to be on the safety
of nuclear power (whether or not it is appropriate for Taiwan) and
whether or not Taiwan has a real need for “nuclear” power.
Although
these two points are valid issues, I would say that there is a more
pertinent issue at hand. This is the question of whether or not the
people of Taiwan are ready to begin making decisions of such
significance or whether such decisions should remain in the hands of
politicians of political parties.
In
the days before communication's/information technology of the
Internet, Representative Democracy was perhaps the best of the
limited options available for the people of Taiwan to participate in government
by choosing which politicians got to make all of the decisions.
Nowadays however, with advances in communication's/information
technology, the only barriers to real/direct Democracy are the
psychological ones, those voices that keep telling the people that
only a few are qualified to determine what's best for all
the people.
So
again I ask, are the people of Taiwan ready to begin making their own
decisions? If so, then I suggest taking charge of the argument and
directing it towards instituting a new form of online Direct
Democracy wherein all proposals, debates and votes from the community levels
on up can be conducted online, on the Internet.
Don't
be fooled by the arguments against Direct Democracy and online
voting. They (I would say) are mostly made by those unfamiliar with
modern technology, and by those who fear losing the traditional power
base afforded to those born into elite families, those with better
education and more money.
The
reality of Direct democracy and online voting is that we already have
the technology and it is extremely difficult to falsify the results.
For example, in the case of a simple yes/no votes on rules and
regulations, voters would need only use their ID numbers to register
to vote and then vote. As soon as one has finished voting, he or she
could go to another page with all the votes next to their
corresponding ID numbers so as to check that his or her vote and all
other votes have been correctly counted. Of course, there are some
more safeguards that may be required. However, the bottom line is
that in opening up the entire process – from proposal to vote –
to full public participation and public scrutiny, the people take
responsibility for the people to ensure that the degree of Democracy
as the collective will of the people is based on the standing
participation of the people and no longer dependent on just the few.
No comments:
Post a Comment